Identification of Materiality
Background of identification
We are currently surrounded by drastic changes in the social environment in which we operate, such as the impact of accelerating climate change since the industrial revolution, digitalization through technological innovation, and diversification of values and lifestyles of people.
In the midst of such social upheaval, we have depicted our ideal society of 2030 as “a resilient society where humans live in harmony with nature,” “a society that feels safe, prosperous, and exciting,” and “a society where different communities and people can coexist,” by combining Meidensha’s initial DNA of “integrity,” “responsibility,” and “social contribution,” which are our strengths, with the DNA that we must not lose of “innovative spirit” and “taking-initiative mind.” With such a mindset, the Meiden Group has set its ideal state of being for 2030, which is “sustainability partnerships that work to build a new society through integrity to the earth, society, and people, and through the power of co-creation.”
In these circumstances, in FY2021, we developed Medium-term Management Plan 2024, and identified major issues (materiality) in the plan by backcasting from our 2030 ideal state of being.
The Meiden Group will embrace the challenge of creating a new society and work toward the realization of a sustainable global environment and happiness for all people by solving materiality that has been identified.
Major Issue (Materiality) Identification Process
Management of Major Opportunities and Risks for the Meiden Group
- We arranged societal changes by 2030 and impact on business management and identified constituent factors through PEST analysis.
- We drafted a longlist (369 societal changes and issues in total), including the aforementioned constituent factors using metrics of international standard-setting organizations and items set by ESG evaluation institutions, to avoid omissions.
- We listed 369 societal changes and issues in total, and arranged them according to opportunities and risks from the perspective of the Meiden Group’s ideal state of being.
Referenced Frameworks and Guidelines, etc.
- SDGs
- GRI standards
- SASB standards
- ISO26000
- ESG evaluation items required by ESG evaluation organizations
- The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact
Evaluation of Importance
- We conducted an overall evaluation of the importance of major risks and opportunities according to the two axes of the Meiden Group and Stakeholders.
Evaluation of Importance to the Meiden Group and Stakeholders


Identification and Determination of Materiality
- We have gathered and designated items that we have deemed are very important opportunities or risks as six material issues.
- ・Designated materiality are discussed and determined by the Sustainability Management Strategy Committee, the Executive Officers’ Meeting, and the Board of Directors.
Gathering and Identification of Six Material Issues

Materiality Relating to Value Creation
Materiality Relating to Our Business Base
Establishment of Targets and KPIs
- Based on our materiality, we are developing strategies and implementing measures under Medium-term Management Plan 2024.*1
- With regard to implementation of measures, we establish KPIs to the extent possible and conduct internal progress management.
- We will regularly review materiality and KPIs.
- *1KPIs include some items that are still not set or are not disclosed. We will continue to consider and scrutinize the selection of measures and specific KPI figures going forward.
- *2We replaced the “environmental contribution” with “GHG reduction contribution” starting with FY2022.
- *3For details on the latest efforts and future development on each major KPI and target, please see Meidensha Report 2024.